RegPulse watches 180+ regulators across the US, EU, and UK, ranks what matters to your firm, and turns each change into a tracked task with a clear owner and exportable evidence. Start with a free, regulator-ready evidence gap report on one AI use case — mapped to the EU AI Act and GDPR in 48 hours.
CASPs operating under the transitional regime must file the authorisation application by the national supervisor's deadline. ESMA published the final Q&A on 12 May.
RegPulse compresses the loop compliance teams already run — read everything, decide what matters, and prove it to an auditor — into a single workspace your team actually opens every day.
180+ tier-1 regulators in the US, EU, and UK monitored daily. Each change is summarised in plain English with a clear link to the source document and the "why it matters for you" framing tied to your firm's footprint.
Every change becomes a tracked work item with a priority, deadline, and named owner. Recommended next actions sit one click away — assign legal, schedule a review, mark complete — so nothing rides on someone's inbox.
Every decision, owner, and source link is captured. Export a board briefing or an evidence pack for an auditor in one click. The compliance paper trail is built as you work, not the weekend before the audit.
Start with one use case. Get a regulator-ready report in 48 hours, then monitor continuously.
Describe a single AI use case, vendor, or workflow — the LLM screening your CVs, the model scoring your customers, the vendor buried in your stack. No call, no demo, no procurement cycle.
We classify the risk tier, identify the obligations it triggers, and check them against the evidence you have today — documenting every gap a regulator or auditor would expect to see.
You receive a regulator-ready evidence gap report and a prioritized remediation checklist. Then RegPulse keeps monitoring 180+ sources so new obligations never catch you out.
RegPulse monitors regulatory sources around the clock and delivers structured intelligence to your team. Here's how.
Continuous scanning of 180+ tier-1 regulatory sources across the US, EU & UK — the world's most active regulatory markets. New rules, amendments, consultations, and guidance captured as they publish.
180+ tier-1 regulatory sources, 3 regionsEvery regulatory update is automatically classified by jurisdiction, sector, impact level, and compliance area. Plain-language summaries included.
Automated classificationDefine exactly what matters to your business. Filter by region, vertical, agency, or keyword. Get notified through email, Slack, or API webhook.
Configurable deliveryWeekly and monthly regulatory digests organized by your coverage profile. Board-ready format with executive summaries and detailed appendices.
Board-ready outputDifferent roles need different things from regulatory data. Here's what each team member gets.
Get a comprehensive view of regulatory changes across every jurisdiction you operate in. Prioritized by impact, delivered on your schedule. No more morning email triage across 15 agency websites.
Every alert includes the full regulatory text, historical context, and precedent analysis. Trace changes back to their source with direct links to official agency publications and related enforcement actions.
Each regulatory update comes with a structured risk score covering enforcement likelihood, financial impact, and compliance timeline. Make data-driven decisions about resource allocation and remediation priorities.
From the SEC to the FCA to ESMA. One platform covering the three jurisdictions that drive global compliance standards.
Industry-specific regulatory tracking tailored to your sector. Each vertical includes curated agency lists, relevant regulation types, and sector-specific risk scoring.
Every alert includes an 8-section analysis. This is a real example — the SEC's proposed climate disclosure rule.
The proposed rule introduces four pillars of disclosure: (1) Climate-related governance and board oversight, (2) Climate risk identification and management processes, (3) Quantitative GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), and (4) Climate-related financial statement impacts including transition costs and physical risk exposure.
Large accelerated filers would face the earliest compliance deadlines. The rule includes a phased implementation allowing smaller registrants additional time. Third-party attestation of emissions data would be required within two years of initial compliance.
| Category | Initial Compliance | Full Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Large Accelerated Filers | FY 2027 | FY 2029 |
| Accelerated Filers | FY 2028 | FY 2030 |
| Non-Accelerated Filers | FY 2029 | FY 2031 |
| Smaller Reporting Companies | FY 2029 | FY 2031 |
Overall Risk Score: 8.4 / 10
| Factor | Weight | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement Likelihood | 30% | 9/10 | SEC Chair has signaled strong enforcement priority |
| Financial Impact | 25% | 8/10 | Estimated $400K-$2M annual compliance cost per registrant |
| Breadth of Impact | 20% | 9/10 | Affects all public companies, ~7,000 registrants |
| Implementation Complexity | 15% | 8/10 | Requires new data systems and third-party assurance |
| Litigation Risk | 10% | 7/10 | Expected legal challenges on Scope 3 requirements |
| Action | Priority | Effort | Est. Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conduct GHG emissions inventory (Scope 1 & 2) | Critical | 3-6 months | $50K-$200K |
| Assess Scope 3 materiality and data availability | High | 2-4 months | $30K-$100K |
| Engage third-party assurance provider | High | 1-2 months | $75K-$250K/yr |
| Update board governance documentation | Medium | 1 month | $10K-$30K |
| Submit comment letter during public comment period | Medium | 2 weeks | $5K-$20K |
| Implement climate risk scenario analysis | Medium | 3-6 months | $100K-$500K |
This is an actual alert from our platform — the SEC's proposed climate disclosure rule. Every alert includes AI-scored risk, compliance deadlines, and action items.
Pick your regions, pick your verticals. One combo = one region + one vertical. Pay for what you monitor.
Select the regions and verticals you need. We'll calculate your combos and recommend the right plan.
Same regulatory intelligence, different price point. Self-serve signup instead of a 6-month procurement cycle.
| Feature | RegPulse | Thomson Reuters | Compliance.ai | CUBE | Google Alerts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $199/mo | $25,000+/yr | $50,000+/yr | $100,000+/yr | Free |
| AI-Powered Analysis | Yes — full 8-section reports | Limited | Yes | Yes | No |
| Self-Serve Signup | Yes — start in minutes | No (sales required) | No (sales required) | No (sales required) | Yes |
| Regions Covered | US, EU & UK — 180+ tier-1 regulatory sources | Global | US / EU only | Global | Any (keyword-based) |
| Industry Verticals | 12 verticals | Limited categorization | Financial services focus | Financial services focus | None |
| Real-Time Alerts | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Delayed (hours to days) |
| Risk Scoring | Quantified, multi-factor | Basic | Yes | Yes | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Free Trial | Yes — 14 days | No | No | No | N/A |
These are the pain points we hear from every compliance team we talk to. RegPulse is built to eliminate them.
A typical 3-person compliance team covering 4 jurisdictions spends 50+ hours per month checking agency websites, reading consultation papers, and triaging updates in spreadsheets. That's time not spent on actual compliance strategy.
Thomson Reuters, Compliance.ai, and CUBE start at $25,000–$100,000/yr with 6-month procurement cycles. For startups and mid-market firms, that's not an option. RegPulse starts at $199/mo.
Manual monitoring means critical regulations slip through. By the time your team discovers a new rule, your competitors may already be preparing. Late discovery means rushed remediation and higher costs.
Figures reflect industry research and conversations with compliance teams. We're pre-launch — early users will help us validate these numbers.
Common questions. If yours isn't here, email us — we respond fast.
Start with a free, regulator-ready evidence gap report on one AI use case — mapped to the EU AI Act and GDPR in 48 hours. No procurement cycle, no demo, no annual contract.